To your PSPP, five items emerged, identified as real mind-worth, football skills, physical condition, physical electricity, and you can attractive human body which have eigenvalues of just one.78, 4.34, 3.59, 3.46, and you will six.08 respectively bookkeeping to possess 64% of your own difference among the many points. In contrast to brand new suggested hierarchical design (Fox Corbin, 1989), although not, the physical care about-well worth measure while the glamorous looks subscale displayed big foundation overlap and have been then removed of subsequent studies. This factor convergence between the attractive looks and you can actual thinking-worthy of bills could have been claimed someplace else (Sonstroem ainsi que al., 1992). The rest about three subscales off physical self-attitudes taken into account 38% of variation from the questionnaire issues. Cronbach (1951) alphas for those subscales had been .ninety to possess recreations ability (6 situations), .86 for physical condition (6 things), and .85 to have real fuel (six products).
The latest POSQ along with demonstrated a very clear grounds build to possess translation. One or two products came up that have eigenvalues greater than 1.00 and you will have been recognized as task (six situations) and you may pride positioning (6 situations) having do it, bookkeeping for 34% and you may 21% of one’s difference within the participants’ solutions, correspondingly. The new interfactor relationship are minimal (roentgen = .04), in keeping with past browse (Benefits Roberts, 1994; Roberts Appreciate 1995) confirming orthogonality of the two points. Leader coefficients have been .71 and you may .90 for the job and you can ego positioning to own get it done subscales, respectively.
The new IMI and additionally exhibited a steady factor build because all of the facts loaded on their respective facts appointment the minimum standards becoming hired to possess translation. Eigenvalues have been higher than step one.00 into the desire/excitement (5 activities), understood ability (4 factors), effort/characteristics (5 circumstances), and you will tension/stress (cuatro circumstances) inherent desire subscales, correspondingly, bookkeeping for 60.1% of your own difference regarding the items. Inner accuracy coefficients were .82 (interest/enjoyment), .77 (thought of competence), .76 (effort/ importance), and .77 (tension/ pressure) for the inherent inspiration getting do so subscales.
Means and you can important deviations of your own actual notice-impression (PSPP), activity and you can ego orientations getting get it done (POSQ), and you will intrinsic inspiration for do so (IMI) subscales are shown in Dining table step one. Extreme no acquisition correlations (2-tailed) was basically noticed between activity orientation getting do it and you will each other desire/thrills (r .29), and effort/pros (roentgen = .36). Self-perceptions away from health was in fact associated so you’re able to appeal/pleasure (roentgen = .49), identified competence (roentgen .59), effort/advantages (r = .49), and you can tension/tension (roentgen = -.27).
The fresh predictor details were composed of notice-thinking of sporting events proficiency, health, and you may actual energy, and additionally activity and you will ego orientations to possess do it. The new standards variables consisted of this new four strategies out-of built-in motivation seniorpeoplemeet getting do so, specifically, interest/enjoyment, understood ability, effort/pros, and you may tension/tension.
74, F(4, 252) = ,p <.0001). Follow-up canonical correlation analysis indicated three significant functions emerged. However, only the first function exceeded the .30 criterion (10% of the variance) suggested as the minimal level for meaningful interpretation (Tabachnick Fidell, 1989). 68 ([R.sup.2]= .46). A minimal canonical loading of .30 is considered to contribute significantly to the multivariate relationship (Pedhazur, 1982). As Table 2 demonstrates, a high positive loading on physical condition, and moderately positive loadings on task orientation for exercise, sports competence, and physical strength, were positively associated to the criterion set of variables composed of interest/ enjoyment, perceived competence, and effort/importance, and were negatively relat ed to tension/pressure for exercise. Ego orientation for exercise, however, failed to significantly contribute to the multivariate relationship. The redundancy index revealed that 16% of the variance in the four indices of intrinsic motivation for exercise could be explained by the linear combination of the predictor variables. A redundancy value of 10% is recommended as a significant and meaningful cutoff for interpretation (Pedhazur, 1982).